Restricted AI Use
AI is prohibited in defined activities, content types, departments, or workflows while permitted elsewhere.
Browse policy index →A public registry tracking organizations that make clear, verifiable commitments about where artificial intelligence will — and will not — be used.
Inclusion requires a clear, publicly verifiable commitment to avoid intentional AI use across the entire organization.
Limited, departmental, task-specific, or technology-specific restrictions are tracked separately in the AI Policy Index.
Organizational AI policies vary widely. Some organizations embrace AI broadly, some restrict particular applications, others are still developing policies, and many have made no clear public commitment. NAPR documents those distinctions rather than treating AI use as a simple yes-or-no question.
Organizations are adopting a wide range of positions: restricted uses, protected human functions, disclosure rules, and explicit red lines.
AI is prohibited in defined activities, content types, departments, or workflows while permitted elsewhere.
Browse policy index →Organizations explicitly preserve human authorship, curation, judgment, creative direction, or other functions.
View classifications →AI is permitted subject to transparency, labeling, consent, verification, or other accountability requirements.
View classifications →NAPR tracks developments that help explain why organizations draw different lines around artificial intelligence.
A category-driven desk for AI-related developments and the issues surrounding adoption, restriction, and governance.
Open news hub →Research notes examine intentional AI use, incidental infrastructure exposure, human-only commitments, and policy gray areas.
View research queue →NAPR separates comprehensive pledges from narrower restrictions so the flagship standard remains meaningful without ignoring real corporate policy.
Read the standard →The flagship NAPR-0 count tracks only comprehensive public no-AI pledges. NAPR separately documents narrower corporate AI restrictions, protected human functions, disclosure rules and permitted uses so that the zero is interpreted against a source-linked body of evidence rather than in isolation.
The original NAPR-0 question remains deliberately narrow and evidence-based.
Track what organizations voluntarily prohibit, protect, permit and disclose.
Explore policies →Normalize laws, bills, guidance, effective dates, obligations and legal status.
Explore regulation →Catalog external research and publish NAPR analysis of trends and change.
Explore research →Develop model standards, consultation drafts, reports and policy frameworks.
View publications →Curate developments and connect each story back to the underlying records.
View news →